Home > Reviews > BlackBerry Bold 9700 Review

BlackBerry Bold 9700 Review

BlackBerry Bold 9700

The BlackBerry Bold 9000 was launched in August 2008, and a year later, the maker has come up with the new improved Bold 9700. And if black isn’t your favorite color, good news is, the white version of the Bold 9700 will be available end of April 2010.

The Bold 9000 has received favorable reviews when it was launched in 2008. Building on its success, it was just a matter of time that Research in Motion (RIM) will come out with the second model. True enough, in December last year, the 9700 was announced and became the latest addition in the BlackBerry Bold family.

It features the similar 624MHz CPU, but with 256MB internal memory (and microSD card slot for expansion) and also has a slimmer form factor compared to its Bold 9000 sibling.

Here’s a look at the specifications compared to the Bold 9000:-

BlackBerry Bold 9700 BlackBerry Bold 9000
CPU 624MHz 624MHz
Memory 128MB RAM, 1GB storage, microSD slot 256MB RAM, microSD slot
Screen size 2.44-inch 2.8-inch
Display Resolution 480 x 360  480 x 320 
Camera 3.2-megapixel w/auto-focus and LED Flash 2-megapixel (3x digital zoom)
Input Backlit QWERTY keyboard, trackpad Backlit QWERTY keyboard, trackball
Connectivity 3G; Bluetooth 2.1; 802.11b/g; 3G; Bluetooth 2.0; 802.11g;
  3.5mm stereo headset, Mini-USB 3.5mm stereo headset, Mini-USB
Battery 1500 mAh  1500 mAh
Standby Time 17 days standby, Talk Time: 6 hours 13.5 days standby, 4.5 hours talk
Dimension 109 x 60 x 14.1mm 114 x 66 x 15mm
Weight 122g 136g

VR-Zone is a leading online technology news publication reporting on bleeding edge trends in PC and mobile gadgets, with in-depth reviews and commentaries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read previous post:
Intel promises more development on Itanium architecture even as Microsoft kills support for IA64

In an article we posted yesterday, Microsoft announced that they would be killing Itanium support on Windows Server in favour...